**Aida Yasuaki**studied under the mathematician Yasuyuki Okazaki in Yamagata from the age of 15 years. The city of Yamagata in which Aida was born and brought up was (and still is) situated in northern Honshu, Japan nearly 300 km north of present day Tokyo. In 1769, Aida went to Edo, which has been renamed Tokyo. There Aida worked for the shogunate of Tokugawa Ieharu. The shogunate was the government of the shogun, or hereditary military dictator, of Japan and this type of rule lasted from 1192 to 1867. The third shogunate in Japan was established in 1603 ruling from Edo. The shogunate was extremely powerful, controlling the emperor, controlling the religious establishments, administering the lands and forming foreign policy. Aida was employed by the shogunate as a civil engineer working on river control and irrigation systems around Edo. However, this was not the job that Aida aimed for since ever since he was young his aim had been to become the best mathematician in Japan.

Also working for the same shogunate at this time was Teirei Kamiya, a mathematician who had been a pupil of Sadasuke Fujita. Aida would have liked to become a pupil of Fujita, for he was one of the leading mathematicians in Japan. Aida saw his friendship with Kamiya as means to be accepted by Fujita and asked Kamiya to arrange for him to be introduced to Fujita. Indeed Kamiya organised the necessary introductions but Aida was not accepted by Fujita.

It appears that relations between Fujita and Aida may have been poor even before Kamiya arranged the introduction, although if that were the case it is unclear quite why Aida worked so hard to obtain the introduction. It was the custom of the time for mathematicians to donate tablets inscribed with mathematical problems to religious temples. These tablets represented offerings of scholarship to the gods. Aida had donated some tablets which contained errors and these had been spotted by Fujita. Perhaps Aida was unaware of these errors at the time he sought to become Fujita's pupil.

Fujita had published a mathematical work *Seiyo sampo* in 1781 and in part his high reputation rested on this highly regarded text. Aida now decided to write a work based on the *Seiyo sampo* yet one which would criticise this work. It is not surprising that relations between Aida and Fujita would deteriorate further when Aida published *Kaisei sampo*, his critical revision of the *Seiyo sampo*. The private feud extended to include other mathematicians when Kamiya, who had lost face by arranging the failed introductions, attacked Aida's *Kaisei sampo*.

The argument eventually turned into a public feud between the Seki school of mathematics and the Sijyo school. Ajima was a friend of Fujita, their friendship arising from the fact that both were pupils of the same teacher Nushizumi Yamaji. Naturally Ajima joined the argument on the side of Fujita and since Yamaji was a recognised master of the leading Seki school of mathematics, the argument soon involved the whole school.

The shogun Tokugawa Ieharu died in 1786 and Tokugawa Ienari became his successor in the following year. Aida lost his post with the arrival of the new shogun and he decided that he would concentrate all his efforts on mathematics [1]:-

Aida compiled... he would live on his savings and devote himself to the perfection of his studies. He also took pupils, including many from the northeastern provinces; these returned to teach in their native regions, where Aida is still revered as a master of mathematics.

*Sampo tensi shinan*which appeared in 1788. It is a book of geometry problems, developing formulae for ellipses, spheres, circles etc. Aida explained the use of algebraic expressions and the construction of equations. He also worked on number theory and simplified continued fraction methods due to Seki.

The remarkable productivity of Aida is commented on in [1] where his contribution is summed up as follows:-

Aida was hard-working and strong-willed and produced as many as fifty to sixty works a year. Nearly2000works survived him, including many on non-mathematical subjects. He was a distinguished teacher of traditional mathematics and a successful populariser of that discipline.

**Article by:** *J J O'Connor* and *E F Robertson*