Waring's Problem and the Goldbach Conjecture
1. Waring's Problem g(k).
The number g(k) is the least number such that every number is the sum of g(k) or less k-th powers.
In his 1920 inaugural lecture, Hardy knew that g(1) = 1, g(2) = 4 and g(3) = 9. He did not have an exact value for g(k) for k ≥ 4 but he gives bounds. The following has been proved since 1920:
g(4) = 19 was proved in 1986 by Ramachandran Balasubramanian, Jean-Marc Deshouillers, and François Dress in two papers.
g(5) = 37 was proved in 1964 by Chen Jingrun.
g(6) = 73 was proved in 1940 by S S Pillai.
Here are the first values of g(k):
1, 4, 9, 19, 37, 73, 143, 279, 548, 1079, 2132, 4223, 8384, 16673, 33203, 66190, 132055, 263619, 526502, 1051899, 2102137, 4201783, 8399828, ...
It is known that g(k) = 2k + [(3/2)k] - 2 for all k ≤ 471,600,000 where [x] is the largest integer less than x. This was proved by J M Kubina and M C Wunderlich, in their paper "Extending Waring's conjecture to 471,600,000" in Math. Comp. 55 (1990), 815-820.
2. Waring's Problem G(k).
The number G(k) is the least number such that for every integer from a certain point onwards is the sum of G(k)or less k-th powers.
Although much progress has been made in determining g(k), there has been much less progress in determining G(k). In his 1920 inaugural lecture, Hardy knew that G(1) = 1, G(2) = 4 and 4 ≤ G(3) ≤ 8. Hardy also knew that 16 ≤ G(4) ≤ 21. The following has been proved since 1920:
G(3) ≤ 7 was proved by Y V Linnik. The result was announced in 1942 in his paper "On the representation of large numbers as sums of seven cubes" in Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR 35 (1942), 162. A proof is given in Linnik's paper "On the representation of large numbers as sums of seven cubes" in Mat. Sb. 12 (1943), 218-224.
G(4) = 16 was proved by Harold Davenport in 1939 in his paper "On Waring's problem for fourth powers" in Ann. of Math. 40 (1939), 731-747.
For G(k), 5 ≤ k ≤ 20, we have the following results which, as of January 2017, we believe are the best obtained so far:
| k | G(k) | Proved by | Journal | Year |
| 5 | ≤ 17 | Vaughan & Wooley | Acta Math. | 1995 |
| 6 | ≤ 24 | Vaughan & Wooley | Duke Math. J. | 1994 |
| 7 | ≤ 33 | Vaughan & Wooley | Acta Math. | 1995 |
| 8 | ≤ 42 | Vaughan & Wooley | Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. | 1993 |
| 9 | ≤ 50 | Vaughan & Wooley | Acta Arith. | 2000 |
| 10 | ≤ 59 | Vaughan & Wooley | Acta Arith. | 2000 |
| 11 | ≤ 67 | Vaughan & Wooley | Acta Arith. | 2000 |
| 12 | ≤ 76 | Vaughan & Wooley | Acta Arith. | 2000 |
| 13 | ≤ 84 | Vaughan & Wooley | Acta Arith. | 2000 |
| 14 | ≤ 92 | Vaughan & Wooley | Acta Arith. | 2000 |
| 15 | ≤ 100 | Vaughan & Wooley | Acta Arith. | 2000 |
| 16 | ≤ 109 | Vaughan & Wooley | Acta Arith. | 2000 |
| 17 | ≤ 117 | Vaughan & Wooley | Acta Arith. | 2000 |
| 18 | ≤ 125 | Vaughan & Wooley | Acta Arith. | 2000 |
| 19 | ≤ 134 | Vaughan & Wooley | Acta Arith. | 2000 |
| 20 | ≤ 142 | Vaughan & Wooley | Acta Arith. | 2000 |
To illustrate the progress towards these "up-to-date" results, we give an indication of how the bounds for G(9) have been improved since Hardy gave his 1920 lecture:
| ≤ | Proved by | Journal | Year |
| 949 | G H Hardy & J E Littlewood | Math. Z. | 1922 |
| 824 | R D James | Proc. London Math. Soc. | 1934 |
| 190 | H Heilbronn | Acta Arith. | 1936 |
| 101 | T Estermann | Acta Arith. | 1937 |
| 99 | V Narasimhamurti | J. Indian Math. Soc. | 1941 |
| 96 | R J Cook | Bull. London Math. Soc. | 1973 |
| 91 | R C Vaughan | Acta Arith. | 1977 |
| 90 | K Thanigasalam | Acta Arith. | 1980 |
| 88 | K Thanigasalam | Acta Arith. | 1982 |
| 87 | K Thanigasalam | Acta Arith. | 1985 |
| 82 | R C Vaughan | J. London Math. Soc. | 1986 |
| 75 | R C Vaughan | Acta Math. | 1989 |
| 55 | T D Wooley | Ann. of Math. | 1992 |
| 51 | R C Vaughan & T D Wooley | Acta Math. | 1995 |
| 50 | R C Vaughan & T D Wooley | Acta Arith. | 2000 |
It has been shown that the following lower bounds hold
| k | G(k) |
| 5 | ≥ 6 |
| 6 | ≥ 9 |
| 7 | ≥ 8 |
| 8 | ≥ 32 |
| 9 | ≥ 13 |
| 10 | ≥ 12 |
| 11 | ≥ 12 |
| 12 | ≥ 16 |
| 13 | ≥ 14 |
| 14 | ≥ 15 |
| 15 | ≥ 16 |
| 16 | ≥ 64 |
| 17 | ≥ 18 |
| 18 | ≥ 27 |
| 19 | ≥ 20 |
| 20 | ≥ 25 |
It has been conjectured that these lower bounds are the correct values for G(k).
3. Goldbach Conjecture.
Hardy states the Goldbach Conjecture in his 1920 inaugural lecture as:
The weak Goldbach Conjecture is:
The strong Goldbach conjecture has been shown to hold for all n up to 4 × 1018. The following table shows the progress towards this:
| 105 | N Pipping | 1938 |
| 108 | M L Stein & P R Stein | 1965 |
| 2 × 1010 | A Granville, J van der Lune & H J J te Riele | 1989 |
| 4 × 1011 | M K Sinisalo | 1993 |
| 1014 | J M Deshouillers, H J J te Riele & Y Saouter | 1998 |
| 4 × 1014 | J Richstein | 2001 |
| 2 × 1016 | T Oliveira e Silva | 2003 |
| 6 × 1016 | T Oliveira e Silva | 2003 |
| 2 × 1017 | T Oliveira e Silva | 2005 |
| 3 × 1017 | T Oliveira e Silva | 2005 |
| 12 × 1017 | T Oliveira e Silva | 2008 |
| 4 × 1018 | T Oliveira e Silva | 2012 |
JOC/EFR January 2017
The URL of this page is:
https://www-history.mcs.st-andrews.ac.uk/Extras/Waring_January 2017.html