The starting point of the historical events which were to play a major role in Parseval' life was the storming of the Bastille on 14 July 1789. From this point the monarchy of Louis 16th was in major difficulties as the majority of Frenchmen put aside their differences and united behind an attempt to destroy the privileged establishment of the church and the state. Parseval, perhaps not surprisingly since he was of noble birth, was a royalist so for him the increasing problems for the monarchy meant that his life was more and more in danger.
In 1792 Louis 16th gave up attempts at a compromise with opponents of the monarchy and tried to flee from France. He did not make it but was arrested and brought back to Paris. It was a time of great danger for royalist supporters and indeed it proved so for Parseval who was imprisoned in 1792.
Following the execution of the King on 21 January 1793 there followed a reign of terror with many political trials. By the end of 1793 there were 4595 political prisoners held in Paris. However France began to have better times as their armies, under the command of Napoleon Bonaparte, won victory after victory. This may have been good news for France in general but royalists like Parseval, despite being freed from prison, remained in fear of their lives.
Napoleon became first Consul in 1800 and then Emperor in 1804. Parseval should have kept his head down if he wanted at avoid trouble but it was a time when it was almost impossible not to get drawn into the political events. Parseval published poetry against Napoleon's regime and, not surprisingly, had to flee from France when Napoleon ordered his arrest. He was successful in avoiding arrest and was able to return to Paris.
Parseval had only five publications, all presented to the Académie des Sciences. The first was Mémoire sur la résolution des équations aux différences partielle linéaires du second ordre Ⓣ dated 5 May 1798, the second was Mémoire sur les séries et sur l'intégration complète d'une équation aux differences partielle linéaires du second ordre, à coefficiens constans Ⓣ dated 5 April 1799, the third was Ingégration générale et complète des équations de la propogation du son, l'air étant considéré avec les trois dimensions Ⓣ dated 5 July 1801, the fourth was Ingégration générale et complète de deux équations importantes dans la mécanique des fluides Ⓣ dated 16 August 1803, and finally Méthode générale pour sommer, par le moyen des intégrales définies, la suite donnée par le théorème de M Lagrange, au moyen de laquelle il trouve une valeur qui satisfait à une équation algébrique ou transcendente Ⓣ dated 7 May 1804.
It was the second of these, dated 5 April 1799, which contains the result known today as Parseval's theorem. Today this theorem is seen in the context of Fourier series, and often also in more abstract settings which are quite far removed from Parseval's original ideas. The original theorem was concerned with summing infinite series. Parseval thought the result was obvious and only remarked that it followed by using de Moivre's result for (cos x + i sin x)n. It also only worked, he noted, when certain imaginary parts of two complex numbers cancelled out. This he reasonably suggested was unfortunate and he hoped to remove this problem later. Indeed he did remove the problem and added a note to this effect in his 1801 publication. The improved version, as given in 1801, states that if two series
Parseval's result was not widely known until his five papers were all published by the Académie des Sciences in 1806. Before that it was known by members of the Académie and it appeared in works by Lacroix and Poisson before Parseval's papers were printed.
Parseval was never honoured with election to the Académie des Sciences. He was proposed on five separate occasions, namely in 1796, 1799, 1802, 1813 and 1828. He was never particularly close although he did come third in 1799, the year that Lacroix was elected. It would not be unfair to say that Parseval has fared well in having a well known result, which is quite far removed from his contribution, named after him. However he remains a somewhat shadowy figure and it is hoped that research will one day provide a better understanding of his life and achievements.
Article by: J J O'Connor and E F Robertson